CCMIN110795 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Michelotti asked about the dissatisfaction with the rate of growth. She asked if the open ended question on the growth rate was taken into consideration with this question. Mayor Tarver commented that transportation facilities were not talked about. He stated that it was as large an issue or greater than the water quality issue. Ms. Acosta stated that a list will be made with the highest to lowest positives and from the highest to lowest negatives. With that staff will look at the negative issues and see if something might be done in that area. Having both perspectives will help to develop an action plan. Mayor Tarver asked if there was a way to introduce dollars to services. The question is asked about knowing the amount of money that is spent on a program and is the recipient satisfied/very satisfied/somewhat satisfied, etc. Liking the service is one question and the other issue is whether the service is liked at this cost. It was stated that there was not much support in the community for facilities, yet the request for a community center got a 58% positive response. It seems there was less opposition to that kind of facility than there was to other additional facilities. Was that based on paying additional money for it? Ms. Franz stated the opposition begins when funds from the community are needed to fund a facility. The City needs a 2/3 vote to pass a tax and she would like to see more than 58 % of the community requesting the facility. Mayor Tarver stated that there are discretionary funds and capital improvement projects. There are capital improvement hearings and the community is asked what it wants. That process is driven by persons in the community who have a particular slant on the facilities they would like developed versus asking the community as a whole what it would like done. Ms. Acosta commented on the question of whether the service/facility was used, as a way to rate the service. Mayor Tarver asked if the survey was available to the public as well as the previous survey. Ms. Acosta stated a copy will be available at the library in the future. Presently, a copy will be available for review at the City Clerk's office or the City Manager's office. Item 6b Ordinance No. 1666, Approving the application of New Cities Development Group for rezoninll and development plan approval, as filed under Case PUD-95-04 (Introduced 10/17/95 - Tarvet/No) Brian Swift commented that this was the second reading of Ordinance No. 1666. 11/07/95 -7-