Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sewell requested someone from the Planning Department come out to his home and <br /> mark where the poles should be placed. <br /> <br /> Item 6b <br /> GPA-95-1/PUD-95-4 - New Cities Development Group <br /> Application 1} to amend the Land Use Element designation of the General Plan from <br /> Community Facilities - Schools to Medium Density Residential, 2) for a proposed !and <br /> exchange between the project site and Hansen Park, and 3) for rezoning to PUD {Planned <br /> Unit Development) - Medium Density Residential District, and 4) development plan <br /> approval for a 34 lot, detached single-family home project. Also for consideration is a <br /> request for the reservation of growth management approval for the project. (SR95:346) <br /> <br /> Brian Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that when going through the Planning Commission report she <br /> thought this property was to be designated R-1-6500 - Medium Density and then she saw PUD- <br /> Medium Density. She stated that the two have different rules and wanted to know which would <br /> be applied here. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that the existing zoning is R- 1-6500. Staff had urged the School District <br /> and New Cities Development to apply for new zoning to PUD, so that Council would be able <br />"' to review the actual development plan versus having it show up as a tentative map. This way <br /> Council would be able to relate to the size of units rather than just the minimum lot size. <br /> Council would have the ability to look at the architecture and all the other things you can do <br /> with a PUD that cannot be done under straight zoned tentative map review. The applicant had <br /> agreed to apply for PUD rezoning. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that the rules for straight zoning are not necessarily relevant. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that the conditions incorporate the R-1-6500 rules for most of the <br /> subsequent setbacks. Carports and sideyards and all the rest of the rules would be the R-1-6500 <br /> rules because the minimum size lots are 6500 sq. ft.. The average lot is much larger than that. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that it appears from the map that there is going to be plenty of <br /> sideyard such that Council could perhaps ask for one side or another of any of these houses to <br /> be given at least the ten feet that it takes to put a cover up without having to go through variance <br /> approval s. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that it could be done as Council reviews the development plan. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if the standards for R-1-6500 were used, because staff felt a PUD <br /> zoning allowed Council more flexibility in reviewing the project. <br /> <br /> 10/17/95 -8- <br /> <br /> <br />