Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Tarver stated that the people on Mirador will be turning left to Bernal against the <br />people turning left from Bernal to Independence. He stated there was no divider. <br /> <br /> Mr. Van Gelder stated that was correct. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver declared the public comment period open. <br /> <br /> Charlotte Severin, 4513 Mirador Drive, spoke in favor of the General Plan Steering <br />Committee recommendation to open Mirafor with right turn only restrictions. She stated that <br />safety was the compelling issue. She felt the turn lanes were not long enough and that speed <br />and multiple vehicles would cause problems. She stated that the Cat Trans standards for just <br />two vehicles (either stacking to turn left or one in either direction) should be 420 feet and only <br />190 feet is available. She stated the General Plan states that no new development shall impact <br />an existing neighborhood, and opening Mirador (part of the new Shappell Development) without <br />restrictions will have a major impact on the existing Pleasanton Heights/Mirador Drive <br />neighborhood. The General Plan also states that local streets are designed to serve only adjacent <br />land uses and are intended to protect the residents from through traffic. Mrs. Severin stated that <br />opening Mirador Drive without turn restrictions creates a major conflict with that policy and <br />invites through traffic to cut across to Valleyview School, thereby not preserving the existing <br />quiet residential neighborhood. She felt that she could accept a compromise to open Mirador <br />Drive with right turn only restrictions. <br /> <br /> Jim Duncan, 617 Angela Street, asked that Mirador be open with no restrictions. He felt <br />this area has been operational for seven months and felt that all the safety concerns have not <br />been borne out. He stated the independent traffic survey and the staff recommendation are to <br />open Mirador with no restrictions. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver stated that the Council received a petition with 444 names in favor of the <br />Subcommittee's recommendation. He also stated he had received 11 phone calls in opposition <br />to the General Plan Steering Committee's recommendation. <br /> <br /> Joan Tenbrink, 4265 Mirador Drive, stated that along Mirador there are 10 children <br />under the age of 18. She stated that the trips that children make to their friends homes are not <br />included in the traffic report because the trips are by foot, bicycle, roller blades, skateboard or <br />some other type of transportation. She asked about safety for the child pedestrian. Mirador has <br />two schools using that street as a school corridor. Ms. Tenbrink asked why is there a need to <br />encourage cut-through traffic where children are at play. Ms. Tenbrink preferred Mirador not <br />be open at all but would agree to a compromise of right turns for the Mirador in and out, four <br />way stops at Neal and Mirador and a three way stop at Del Sol and Mirador. <br /> <br /> James D. Duncan, 4681 Third Street, stated he would like to see Mirador Drive open <br />with no restrictions. <br /> <br />06/27/95 -5 - <br /> <br /> <br />