Laserfiche WebLink
LAVWMA is using the 21 MGD of dry weather flows, it has been close in exceeding that <br /> capacity during wet weather. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum stated the current dry weather flow through LAVWMA is about 12 MGD but <br /> in January this year it was running at full capacity. Current storage will allow about 5-10 years <br /> of continued growth before there's an unacceptable risk of overflows from the storage ponds <br /> during the peak wet weather. Seventy-one MGD is the maximum size of the proposed peak wet <br /> weather flow. LAVWMA needs to have large enough capacity for the peak flows during the <br /> wet season or it will have to build more storage. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis requested clarification on whether the proposal would limit LAVWMA to <br /> 32 MGD of average dry weather flow. She believed what is really at stake is the wet weather <br /> capacity, not the average dry weather flow. It essentially means LAVWMA must, during wet <br /> weather, store the excess capacity or put it in the pipe. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver says there is no agreement at this time so we don't know of any <br /> restrictions that might be imposed. Getting an agreement is one thing, getting the residents to <br /> support it is another. Having an agreement in hand allows us to ask the voters would they <br /> support it. If there are conditions put on by Hayward, then we should discuss that too. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis stated that the size of the pipe and the wet weather flow were something <br /> different than the piece of the agreement whether there is going to be a limit on what our <br />- average dry weather flow is. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver stated there are two issues: the replacement of the pipeline, which is <br /> extremely expensive; and the other is building storage ponds, if we don't get the wet weather <br /> flow taken care of and if the pipe isn't big enough. He was worried that the storage ponds <br /> might overflow before the pipe is installed, since it'll take 5-7 years to do it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked what is the population that our existing agreement could suppert. Right <br /> now it supports 55,000 people. What is the projected population if we didn't add any sewer <br /> capacity? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said 5.1 to 6.9 MGD of dry weather flow is all we can produce before we will <br /> have used up our capacity in the LAVWMA system. The reserves that the City has set aside <br /> all have growth management approval and that is 2500 to 3000 units beyond today. That will <br /> add approximately another 10,000 people. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if the disposal capacity we now have would allow us to have a City that <br /> has 65-70 thousand residents and effectively provide sewer service for all the commercial and <br /> office development that is projected at build out of the City. This proposal asks for a 50% <br /> <br /> 05/16/95 <br /> -16- <br /> <br /> <br />