My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN032195
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCMIN032195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:18 AM
Creation date
5/20/1999 11:06:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ed Rouquette, 3436 Windsor Court, indicated the Phillips had operated a day care <br />facility in the past which he believed had an excessive number of children, approximately <br />twenty, who were unsupervised. He further objected to the fact that the CC&R's are not <br />being considered and felt a residential area was becoming commercial. He complained <br />of traffic, parking, and safety issues. <br /> <br /> Hannelore Homoredy, 3409 Blakemore Court, lives behind the applicants' property <br />and across a greenbelt. She was concerned about possible noise from the children when <br />they are playing outside. <br /> <br /> Candy Phillips, 3444 Windsor Court, indicated she has lived on Windsor Court <br />for 25 years. When she first decided to operate a day care facility, she told Mr. <br />Rouquette and he never indicated there was a problem. She was shocked when she heard <br />of the opposition to the application and the threat of legal action. The only incident she <br />could recall from her prior operation involved two hyperactive little boys who used to <br />play with Mr. Rouquette's son and the only double-parking incident involved the mother <br />of these boys. Ms. Phillips indicated she declined to continue to care for these children. <br />Her prior operation was very successful and she is still in contact with some of the <br />children she had cared for and their parents. <br /> <br /> Ms. Phillips indicated she was willing to revise her license to care for only small <br />children to mitigate concerns about noise, since there would be only a few at a time <br />outside. The children's nap times would be rotated and the length of time outside would <br />be only about 40 minutes or less. She explained she had initially agreed to a limit of ten <br />children for six months and then after a review, she would apply for 12 children. After <br />the appeal was filed however, she decided not to go through the whole process twice and <br />applied for the maximum of 12 children from the beginning. Ms. Phillips has cleaned <br />out her garage (to park her car inside) and has passed out a flyer to all her customers to <br />explain the concerns about traffic. The parents now park in her driveway and strive not <br />to drive into the Court at all. She showed a photograph of the greenbelt area behind her <br />house to illustrate the distance between her backyard and Ms. Homorody. Ms. Phillips <br />asked if Ms. Homorody had ever heard noise and was told she had not. Ms. Phillips <br />referred to the remark that she had twenty children in her prior day care. She said she <br />had twenty different children over a period of years, not all at one time. <br /> <br /> Jeffrey Phillips indicated he and his wife do not want to take advantage of their <br />neighbors and want to be friends with them. Nothing had ever been said to him about <br />any problems from the prior or current operation. <br /> <br />03/21/95 <br /> -5- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.