Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Dennis asked what would be involved in exploring the concept of a non-profit <br />corporation. She really preferred the City to endow a fund that is raising money from other <br />areas. The City would give the non-profit some credibility but administration would be by the <br />non-profit. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta indicated that a 501(3)(c) could be done within ninety days. It has been done <br />for other organizations like the Centennial Committee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated there are many ideas out there, but the point is do we want to pursue <br />this and have staff come back with options. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico adamantly supported seizing this opportunity to assist the youth. Pleasanton <br />is a model city and it can find ways to administer the money prudently. We can have public <br />hearings to explore all possibilities. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico to approve staff recommendations 1 through 4 with the <br />exception that in Item #1 a transfer of $301,782 to the General Fund instead of $401,782 and <br />an item #5 be added to set aside $100,000 in a fund with uses yet to be determined but with a <br />general purpose of using the money for youth related activities, with staff to come back with <br />options. <br /> <br /> The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver spoke strongly in support of following the process. He was not sure the <br />$100,00 was the appropriate amount to set aside for youth activities. However, in reviewing <br />the funds according to established procedures all questions can be answered and all can apply <br />for funds equally. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis requested that the motion include looking at ways of creating funding for <br />youth programs and establishing the intent of Council to use funds for youth activities. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Tarver, seconded by Mr. Pico, to approve staff recommendations <br />2, 3 and 4 and the $401,782 to be put into a reserve for allocation through the normal budget <br />and CIP process, including direction to explore ways of creating funding for youth programs. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti did not support placing the entire $401,782 back into the CIP. She could <br />support $100,000 in an undesignated fund. The CIP projects could include a teen center and <br />that is a service to the entire community. The problem arises because there are so many <br />unfunded projects. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta suggested going back to setting up an undesignated fund of $100,000. The <br />$301,782 keeps the CIP whole. There is a danger of jeopardizing current CIP programs by <br />opening up the entire CIP budget. Staff will bring back concepts for a youth program. <br /> <br />01/17/95 <br /> 16- <br /> <br /> <br />