My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN110596
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN110596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:55 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 11:20:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tarver believed that if a standard is adopted, it stands and there is no additional <br />measurement. If no standard is adopted, then we measure the traffic and they have to make <br />adjustments on other lots. <br /> <br /> There was discussion about the standards and whether the studies were sufficient or <br />additional studies were necessary. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift believed there were conflicting motions. One says adopt a trip generation <br />coefficient standard and there will be no subsequent check once the building is built. Mr. Pico <br />is saying adopt an interim figure of .53, but there is also a requirement to check that once the <br />hotel is occupied and make adjustments on square footage for other lots in Hacienda Business <br />Park. Those adjustments could not be made for two to two and a half years. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver explained his understanding of the differences in the motions: Mr. Pico is <br />saying do not adopt the standard until there is an actual count; Mr. Tarver is saying that if this <br />Council or a future Council adopts a standard for this type hotel, then it is done and no further <br />study is necessary. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico said his intent was if a standard is not adopted now, then there will be a study. <br />If Council adopts a standard, then it will apply and no study is to be done. <br /> <br /> The vote on the amendment to the motion was as follows: <br /> <br />The roll Call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> The vote on the original motion, as amended, was as follows: <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> There was a break at 8:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> The meeting was reconvened at 8:40 p.m. <br /> <br /> - 9 - 11/05/96 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.