Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sweeney stated that if we assume a lower trip generation, the contract with <br />Summerfield does not allow Hacienda to deduct more. He was willing to continue to work with <br />staff. <br /> <br /> Discussion continued regarding whether to measure the trip generation and when the <br />study would be done. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti indicated the Planning Commission felt comfortable transportation would <br />be provided for a large number of occupants of these hotels and the hours would be flexible and <br />not add to peak hours traffic. <br /> <br /> Robert Gray, 2350 Willet Way, Pleasanton, indicated he has a business in Hacienda <br />Business Park and would love to have a facility like this. He also suggested that the occupants <br />could be given rides by coworkers who could pick them up on the way to work. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti believed the Planning Commission looked at the design carefully and she <br />concurred with its recommendations. She supported lighter colors for the building and agreed <br />with the Planning Commission. She believed this type of use does not generate the same number <br />of trips a Marriott or similar hotel would and agreed most destinations of the guests would be <br />within Hacienda Business Park and could be handled with vanpools. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Ms. Mohr, to introduce Ordinance No. <br />1698, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the <br />application of Summerfield Suites for a PUD (Planned Unit Development) modification to <br />allow hotel uses on the site and adopting Resolution No. 96-124, granting design review <br />approval for the construction of a two-building, 140,000 sq.~. hotel complex consisting of <br />a total of 241 suites on Site 13F of the Hacienda Business Park, located at 5955 Inglewood <br />Drive, except that these conditions are modified as follows: Condition #4 to indicate the <br />trip generation figure shall be .53 for p.m. hours; Condition #5 is deleted pursuant to the <br />Planning Commission recommendations; Condition #6 is amended so that the colors of the <br />building and roof shall be lighter and the developer shah work with staff prior to painnting; <br />Condition #24 shah state the hours of construction shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. <br />unless complaints are received from residents along the haul routes. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico made an amendment to the motion, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to adopt a <br />trip generation figure of .53 for p.m. hours but then to measure it at the time the hotel is <br />at full occupancy. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr referred to the annual of traffic. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift clarified that the annual review takes place at actual intersections, and does <br />not address trip generation rates from particular land uses. <br /> <br /> - 8 - 11/05/96 <br /> <br /> <br />