My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081396
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN081396
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:56 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 11:02:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Sherwood indicated Council has already authorized the greenwaste program and <br />vendors have been reviewed for purchase of the cans and we are ready to purchase the <br />containers. Once they are delivered, PGS is ready to implement the program. Once the order <br />is placed, it is expected to be four to six weeks before the containers will be delivered to the <br />residents. Once that is done, collection will start every other week from each customer. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if there was any reason to delay purchase of the containers. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver indicated he wanted the decision delayed on ordering the cans because there <br />may be different decisions made on the services. If you want to be fair and equitable, there <br />should be a standard rate for all. A 90 gallon can equals about 22 cents a gallon for garbage. <br />A 30 gallon can with the manual process is 40 cents a gallon and the 35 gallon can is paying 50 <br />cents a gallon for garbage. There is no incentive for people to recycle and cut back on the <br />waste. He does not understand what the complexity is. If you want 90 gallons, pay for it. We <br />are trying to stop people from putting out so much garbage and this is not happening. For <br />senior citizens and those who are recycling, the City is not offering significant incentives. In <br />fact, he thinks they are being penalized. It seems we are trying to protect the 90 gallon can <br />service and he does not understand why. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian indicated people who do recycle put their recycled material inside the can. <br />Those who take it directly to the dump receive a benefit in their rates. People who actively <br />recycle put their material in the can so they need a larger can. Also just because someone has <br />a smaller can doesn't mean they are recycling. They could have a compactor and are getting <br />the benefit of a weight-based system so their can can be heavier than a 90 gallon can, but we <br />are charging them less than their neighbor. Also not all of the cost is built into the disposal <br />cost. The majority of the cost is in picking up the cans. There are complexities with our <br />system, which is a blue bag/transfer station based system, that is more complex than a transfer <br />station based system. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti still wanted to know why we can't order the greenwaste container now. <br />That is the size we are going to use isn't it? <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian indicated that is an option of the City Council. Staff is recommending this <br />size based on observations of the greenwaste pilot program and comments from the public. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti agreed with that. If someone does a tremendous amount of yard work <br />in two weeks and that can is not adequate, they can ask for an extra pickup occasionally. There <br />are many people who use 90 gallon cans who don't fill their can, but there are occasions when <br />the entire capacity is needed. If we are trying to implement the greenwaste program as quickly <br />as possible, she does not understand why we can't order the cans now. <br /> <br />08/13/96 <br /> -15- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.