My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081396
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN081396
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:56 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 11:02:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Bocian said they were not and multifamily includes apartment and condominium <br />residences. <br /> <br /> Larry Moyer, 2142 Goldcrest Circle, also wanted clarification on the staff report <br />regarding the increases of fees from $12.57 to $14.00 to $16.00 in 1998. He was told that <br />$16.00 would not be reached until 1999 when the rates are reviewed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sherwood stated that the way the resolution is drafted is that the rates for customers <br />who currently have the manual collection and are currently paying $12.57 will have an increase <br />to $14.00 on 10/1/96. Effective April 1, 1998 the rate will go to $16.00. There is no rate <br />beyond that point, however it states that effective with the first general rate review after April 1, <br />1996, which would be April 1999, that those customers would be treated the same as customers <br />in the first part of the resolution who are currently paying $18.00. It is not necessarily saying <br />the rate will be $18.00 in 1999 or $16.00 or whatever. It merely says the intention is to remove <br />the special treatment as of 1999 and that all customers will be treated the same. <br /> <br /> Mr. Moyer also felt the percentage increase was high for the people with small cans. <br />They are using less than half of the capacity of the 90 gallon cans and the automation should <br />save PGS some money. He felt they were getting hit more than the people with 90 gallon cans. <br />He felt the City was not doing much for recycling. The current program of picking recyclables <br />off a conveyor belt does not encourage the residents to reduce the waste or recycle. Also, if the <br />greenwaste is removed from the 90 gallon cans, many people will not need a 90 gallon can and <br />the concern is how many will switch to a 35 gallon can. He felt there was a problem with the <br />phrase "revenue neutral". It seems like the City Council is helping the garbage service at the <br />expense of the residents. He asked who owns the cans, Pleasanton Garbage Service or the City <br />of Pleasanton? <br /> <br /> Mr. Sherwood indicated PGS owns the automated containers. The customers on manual <br />service own their own containers. The City is purchasing the greenwaste containers and the 35 <br />gallon containers with Measure D money and they will be owned by the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Mr. Moyer indicated there are discrepancies in the garbage fees in the area. In <br />Livermore, the fee for a 32 gallon container is $9.64. He did not think it was fair for the City <br />of Pleasanton to pay $12.00. He felt there could be lower rates if the service went out to bid. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if there was a senior rate. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sherwood said there was a discount for seniors for any of the services. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked what the time frame was for initiating the greenwaste program and <br />ordering the special cans. <br /> <br />08/13/96 <br /> -14- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.