My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN041696
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN041696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:45 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 10:12:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/1996
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tarver asked who controls the transportation corridor? The Council doesn't, the <br />County does. It could approve it tomorrow, but does not want to have objections from <br />Pleasanton. That is what we are trying to determine. The County has done environmenta/ <br />studies for the corridor and it is in its General Plan. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if Mr. Tarver wanted the environmental work on this? <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver felt that was the County' s decision since it is the agency that will make the <br />ultimate decision. Mr. Tarver did not believe the County knew whether Pleasanton supported <br />this or not and that is what he is trying to determine. Once Pleasanton says whether it wants <br />the project or not, the County can then make the environmental f'mdings based on its processing <br />of the application in the County. Pleasanton is not in that at all. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr indicated she had been told the overcrossing at Happy Valley was seismically <br />unsafe and asked if that were true. <br /> <br /> Mr. Churka said that was erroneous information. He felt people wanted it tom down so <br />they could build a wider crossing for the Castlewood Heights developments. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked if the road is widened, would the Castlewood Heights developer pay for <br />that? <br /> <br /> Mr. Churka indicated it is the County' s position to maintain the corridor intact and ff the <br />road is widened, the developer would also have to widen the overpass. He referred to the golf <br />course issue and felt Sycamore Road was the only access for it. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that several people have indicated a family entertainment aspect could <br />be incorporated with activities for children, besides just riding the train. <br /> <br /> Mr. Churka indicated that is why he wanted to come into town and stop behind the fire <br />station and across from the park. That is the perfect place for a family to come out, have a <br />picnic, take the train ride and tour downtown Niles, then come back. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr felt that if the train stopped at the five acre parcel on Bernal, picnic facilities <br />could be developed there as well. <br /> <br /> Mr. Churka felt more people would be walking into town to shop and use facilities. <br /> <br /> Mr. Michelotti asked if Mr. Churka had considered some way of taking people downtown <br />from Bernal. Stopping at Bernal could relieve many of the grade crossing problems. <br /> <br />04/16/96 <br /> -28- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.