Laserfiche WebLink
:' It was moved by Ms. Dennis to authorize staff to begin recommendations A to G, <br /> with a limit on spending $100,000 within the next three months and to get a facilitator <br /> ready to begin on June 1st. <br /> <br /> There was no second. <br /> <br /> Mr. Temple felt that just sitting down together and looking at maps to determine an <br /> alternate road would be helpful. Using the church as a meeting place sounds like a reasonable <br /> thing. More than anything, he wanted to get the issues out and clearly understood. He did not <br /> think they were disagreements between property owners and residents of the area. He believed <br /> having a golf course planner would be more beneficial than a faeilitator. The concerns are about <br /> mitigations. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta indicated that is what staff will do in November. <br /> <br /> There was general discussion about what a facilitator could do or whether the same thing <br /> could be accomplished by the parties just getting together to talk. <br /> <br /> Mr. Manning indicated there are no confficts, just issues that need to be addressed. He <br /> felt the suggestion of Ms. Acosta was workable. While staff was hiring consultants and <br /> proceeding with the plan, the parties can meet to work out the 10% problems. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Michelotti, to adopt the staff <br /> recommendations A - G, but initially appropriating only $100,000, and the property owners <br /> and community members are to meet for the next thirty days to discuss the issues. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Pico, and Mayor Tarvet <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Councilmember Mohr <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 6d <br /> Report regarding development of downtown _grant _nrot, ram with recommendations on <br /> funding, (SR96:61) <br /> <br /> This item was continued to March 19, 1996. <br /> <br /> 03/05/96 <br /> -15- <br /> <br /> <br />