Laserfiche WebLink
revised project cost estimate and the available revenues. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Dennis, Michelotti, and Mayor Tarver. <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Councilmember Pico <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> There was a break at 8:43 p.m. <br /> <br /> The meeting reconvened at 8:52 p.m. <br /> <br /> Item 6c <br /> Revised Growth Management Program. (SR97:340) <br /> <br /> Brian Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> Ron Winters, 5506 Sunol Blvd, said the new ordinance as proposed would add an <br /> additional financial burden on small builders and developers because of the expense of preparing <br />__ the final map, but on the other hand small projects would not have to walt in line behind projects <br /> that may not get built. He would like paragraph 17.36.050(D) to be amended so that not all the <br /> units would have to come out of first-come, first-served units. He requested Council to consider <br /> four things: 1) the number of units in the major projects and first-come, first-served projects <br /> be made ranges; 2) for a project 70-99 units in size; that the maximum number of building <br /> permits per year be changed from 35 to 45 units per year; (3) for a project 40-69 units in size, <br /> the maximum number of building permits be changed from 25 to 35 units per year; and (4) a <br /> project of less than 40 units be allowed to build out all in one year. He requested an incentive <br /> be offered to increase the number of affordable housing units made available. Lastly, he would <br /> like modifications made to Section 17.36.060 that would allow those extra units to be taken from <br /> somewhere other than first-come, first-served. <br /> <br /> Patrick Costanzo, Vice President for Greenbriar Sycamore Valley Company, 7901 <br /> Stoneridge, Suite 504, said his company has a contract to purchase the School District's surplus <br /> property in the North Sycamore Specific Plan area. The company entered into the transaction <br /> with the understanding that the School District had an agreement with the City for a reservation <br /> of growth management in 1998 and 1999. The reservations were projected at 102 per year, for <br /> a total of 204 allocations. The company is working towards approvals to be able to begin the <br /> project next spring. He said the new growth management plan does not identify these allocations <br /> specifically. It has been explained by staff that those allocations would come out of the number <br /> of units available for new projects. He asked Council to preserve the allocated units for them. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said the existing program has a reservation for the North Sycamore specific <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 9 11/18/97 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />