My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN071597
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCMIN071597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:36 AM
Creation date
5/10/1999 5:58:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/1997
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
about the waste of money than they could spare us all by not administering this at all. The <br />people have organized an assault on the people' s civil fights. This is how the government works <br />and the people complaining should accept that. <br /> <br /> David Stauffer, 1955 Brooktree Way, thought this ended Saturday. He thought nothing <br />would happen until the second reading. He said people were properly notified about the July <br />12 meeting, but for tonight's meeting people were not notified. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said the public would be notified if the Council decides to reconsider the <br />ordinance going on the ballot. <br /> <br /> Mr. Stauffer also said there were no statistics that confirmed how many times a gun had <br />been used for murder, rape, robbery, and breakins. He said law enforcement does not support <br />this ordinance. He agreed with putting this on the ballot. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis commented that if anyone wished to get a copy of the article published by <br />the office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion from the Public Health Service, they <br />should contact the City Clerk's office. <br /> <br /> Cindy McGovern, 9206 Longview Drive, commented there is no need for a City Council <br />if everything would be going to the vote of the people. She was dismayed with the reasons <br />people had to keep junk guns. She did not believe God truly wanted the people to arm <br />themselves. She said it was ludicrous to believe a war would be fought with junk guns. She <br />said the forefathers of the United States had no idea how advanced society would become. She <br />felt children are not raised today with the same values. She said this junk gun ordinance needed <br />to be passed to keep Pleasanton a safe, loving community. People in the community have the <br />opportunity to get the ordinance appealed, if they so desired. <br /> <br /> Stu Fleck, 4763 Nicol, Livermore, wanted to make Council aware of what happened in <br />Livermore when this issue was put to vote. Some of the things that happened were intimidation, <br />vandalism, people threatening others and division of the community. <br /> <br /> Dorothy Piper, said she was dismayed over all the issues. People wanted to remove the <br />guns and/or the vote issue. She believed Pleasanton is a safe community. It saddened her to <br />see the people separated by this issue. <br /> <br /> Judy Symcox, 1450 Groth Circle, commented the founding fathers had multiple weapons <br />in their homes in order to achieve what needed to be done. She said when the society was more <br />rural, children were raised with multiple guns in the homes. She felt there was no problem in <br />Pleasanton that needed to be addressed. The ordinance will only be costly to administer and is <br />unenforceable. She told Council there were already nine bills in Sacramento. She said she is <br />ready to handle the ballot initiative. She agreed the ordinance needed to be rewritten. She said <br />the fight to vote would be the cheapest and fairest way to go. If this does not go to vote, a <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 07/15/97 <br />Minutes 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.