My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060397
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCMIN060397
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:36 AM
Creation date
5/10/1999 5:45:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/3/1997
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Tarver said it was up to Council to decide whether the priority list and dates were <br />realistic. He would like staff to include on the list the primary department responsible for each <br />project and if an outside contractor is hired. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said this information was available. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayaia asked if the correct date for the water rights was June 30, 1997. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said one of the issues with the water rights is that the target has been moving. <br />The focus has changed to include the "Clean Water Revival Project", LAVWMA, the San <br />Francisco property, as well as contract negotiations with Zone 7. Outside Counsel has been <br />retained to advise as to what the City's rights are. There should be something by the end of <br />June. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis said water is an asset and felt the water rights needed to be determined <br />because over the years it will be very important for future negotiations. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said she brought the issue up because she wanted Council to understand <br />what it was going forward with and then reaffirm it. She asked staff about the Remen Tract <br />time line. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said staff would work on the highest priorities first. For example, if <br />Engineering has to spend time between San Francisco, LAVWMA, the Golf Course, the <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan and the Remen Tract, they would all be done before <br />the Remen Tract. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver reiterated again that Council needs to decide about the dates. If Council <br />wanted a project moved up then it needed to direct staff to do so. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said hiring consultants provided a considerable amount of assistance but <br />projects still need staff involvement. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the Remen Tract project was a new priority. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian said it was a new priority that would be incorporated into the list. The <br />project's time line is dependent upon the resident's support. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis said she had been saving the reports regarding the Happy Valley project and <br />felt these would be helpful for the Remen Tract residents. She felt both had some of the same <br />issues and it would save time. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver agreed. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 06/03/97 <br />Minutes 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.