CCMIN040197 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Dennis said a new plan was required in any case. Approval of a specific plan would not necessarily mean the security deposit would be released. Mr. Lum said agreed. Ms. Ayala said the owners of Parcels 2 and 3 might feel more comfortable once a specific plan was in place. Mr. Lum thought they may. Ms. Michelotti asked if the plan to go between Parcels 2 and 3 was the best place for the roadway? Mr. Lum said there could be a better location depending on the proposals that may come forward in the future. As to date, it was the best location. Ms. Michelotti asked if the alignment of the proposed road to serve Parcel 4 was determined? Mr. Lum said no. Mayor Tarver asked if the owner of Parcel 2 submitted a development plan for the -- parcel, would the roadway have to be put in? Mr. Lure said yes. Staff would require the owner of Parcel 2 to build half of the roadway. The Mayor opened the matter for public input. Brian McGuire, 233 Del Valle Court, thanked staff for the time involved in this process. He stated he did not know of any other piece of property that had been annexed, rezoned, and had to wait four to five years before development. He felt it was unfair to make him wait because of the problems in other parts of the Vineyard Corridor, which is why he wanted two separate specific plans. He suggested Council appoint a subcommittee of Ms. Dennis and Ms. Ayala to oversee this process. Mr. McGuire disagreed with various portions of the staff report. He contended that he was the only property owner to make a security deposit. He also objected to the contents of the Deferred Street Improvement Agreement. He did not believe that any property owner had any interest in the access road or any rights to the money he had put on deposit. He believed some kind of deed restriction could protect the city's rights and he was willing to agree to that. City Council 04/01/97 Minutes 16