My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN010599
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN010599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
3/14/1999 10:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/5/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development is going to change the current lifestyle and she does not want more homes added. <br />She would like her concerns considered. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harlan said Greenbriar is paying an affordable housing fee in addition to the offer <br />secondary units. He believed the City code allowed for the construction of secondary units and <br />the State code encourages their construction. The intent is not to double the density of the <br />project, but rather to offer an option. This proposal was done at the proposal of Council. At the <br />Planning Commission hearing there were no comments against this. He felt the units addressed <br />the affordable housing requirement by allowing in-laws, health care providers, or students, the <br />ability to live and provide a service to the people in the neighborhood. Greenbriar is following <br />all the guidelines and rules required by the City. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked him to address the issue if the unit is used as a pool house. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harlan said then the unit would not be equipped with a kitchen and would only used <br />as an accessory structure. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how big the lots had to be to allow these units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harlan said the secondary units are 756 square feet. The limiting factors would be <br />the floor to area ratio and the physical setbacks. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked out of the 114 lots, how many are eliminated right away? <br /> <br /> Mr. Harlan believed approximately nineteen. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how many lots could accommodate detached units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harlan said about 35 percent of the 92 lots. <br /> <br /> There being no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked staff to explain what could happen if there is no master conditional <br />use permit regarding secondary units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said the state law provides that, assuming certain criteria are met, the City's <br />discretion to deny secondary units is limited. The City can still look at concerns regarding <br />aesthetics, parking, traffic, etc., but the area of inquiry is limited. The idea under this proposal <br />is to limit the number of units. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis understood this permit only addresses the detached units and there are <br />options for secondary units within the houses. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 01/05/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.