Laserfiche WebLink
at the natural grade at 442 feet elevation. During the course of construction when the fire <br />turnaround was made at the elevation as the building pad it did not look natural. When he <br />checked this out he discovered the elevation was at 445 and not at the 442 that he was planning <br />on in order to slope down to his driveway. The design was changed out in the field and dirt was <br />pushed onto his property. In doing so it made a wider shoulder. This does not look natural. He <br />is asking Mr. Thomas to put a two foot shoulder on the turn around and slope it 3 to 1 down to <br />where it meets the natural grade elevation. In the four years he has lived on his property he has <br />not noticed any further grading. He said the present contour lines do not match the 1994 contour <br />lines. He said he did not intend for the edge of the hammerhead turnaround to be used as a <br />setback line. It is important to have the house sit back from the property line so it is less visible. <br /> <br /> Mr. Thomas said the construction drawings clearly stated the elevation for the <br />hammerhead turnaround. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala was concerned with the dirt that had been taken out around the oak trees <br />coming back during the rainy season. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said he has not seen the recommendations proposed by Horticulture Science. <br />There should be erosion control in place. Because there is a natural slope on the property, there <br />probably is not that much loose dirt on the slope. Staff will look at the recommendations and <br />make a determination as to what needs to be done to protect the trees. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the easement is proposed to accommodate a building pad. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said the previous property owners had worked out a solution which they <br />thought would satisfy everyone, which included lot line adjustments. The lot line adjustments <br />did not take place. So Mr. Thomas and Mr. Nelson worked out an arrangement to put the <br />hammerhead turnaround back as it was shown and Mr. Nelson gets an easement across the <br />driveway to reach his property. Mr. Thomas gets the obligation to maintain the triangle and <br />make it part of the yard of the property on the upper level. This arrangement happens routinely <br />in small lot single family projects where property lines are set three to four feet over and one <br />property owner is given an exclusive easement for purposes of yard and landscape maintenance. <br />The City Council can set the setback from wherever it would like, as long as the building is not <br />on Mr. Nelson's property. Staffs recommendation is to measure the setback from the property <br />line rather than from the easement. He said the driveway establishes a normal point as to where a <br />setback would begin if the lot line adjustments had taken place. If the property owners are in <br />agreement, it did not matter to staff. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if the lot line adjustment had been made, would the Nelsons have had a <br />floor area ratio problem. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said no. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 14 11 / 17/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />