Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Acosta said substantial contributions from the General Fund have been made to <br />public facility projects. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi said the fees that have been paid represent about one-third of the revenues <br />from the General Fund, Gas Tax and gram monies. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver felt the fees were too low. He understood how staff came up with the <br />numbers. He said there are new things that are needed for the community for its services <br />through buildout and this fee is being divided between the existing residences and new <br />development. He liked this concept. But what about the existing facilities that people will use? <br />Where is the nexus there? Are the facilities free? <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said considerable time was spent looking at this issue. There have been <br />substantial contributions made from previous sources that are here today but were not here <br />yesterday. Therefore, it is a proportion of exactions and proportions of debt services over time <br />and proportions from the General Fund Revenue, sales tax, gas tax, and property taxes. There <br />was much debate and staff looked at a buy-in fee. She said part of the process is to develop <br />something that if challenged, will be successful. If there was more singular revenue reliance the <br />process would be easier. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi said approximately 3 million dollars in projects have been used as buy-in fees. <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if the people who pay the fees in large part are existing residents. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said the tax base is what will fund the other portion of the fee and in some <br />cases the largest portion. Part of the fee is being paid for by the business and residential <br />community and by folks that do not even live here. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said over the past three years the sales tax revenues have outstripped the <br />property tax revenues. Where the fees come from seem to balance out over the years. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said the revenues mostly support the general services fund and a small <br />portion is then transferred into the capital improvement projects fund. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said $14 million for the Prop 4 override helped to fund some of the <br />present facilities like the library, Senior Center, etc. Most of that revenue came from growth <br />in the 1980's and from development of commercial real estate. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said the businesses that claim the City of Pleasanton as point of sale help <br />provide funds that might not have been available. Since the revenue is very diversified, it is <br />difficult to identify what number belongs to what business. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 17 10/20/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />