My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090898
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN090898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 6:54:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/8/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
modified unanimously by the agencies; 2) the sewer service area would be limited to the existing <br />and future incorporated areas of Pleasanton, Livermore and Dublin and a western portion of San <br />Ramon, with minor exceptions, and no sewer service would be to the Tassajara and Dougherty <br />Valley areas; and 3) a new pipeline would be constructed with a capacity of 21 million gallons <br />per day. The development of the RO project would not adjust or increase design the limitations <br />of the Principles of Agreement. The principles of agreement also provided for a number of <br />correlating issues to be addressed. For example if the City of Pleasanton chooses not to <br />participate in the RO project, DSRSD would retain all disposal, capacity rights and recycling <br />rights from the RO project but could not use City funds for construction or operation of that <br />project. The City's agreement is required before its wastewater can be used for the RO project <br />unless it is determined that it is less expensive to dispose of the influent through RO than <br />through the LAVWMA facilities. <br /> <br /> Bob Beebe, General Manager of DSRSD, said from 1989-1993 DSRSD has worked with <br />the City of Livermore and Zone 7 to prepare a plan for the use of recycled water. In 1993, the <br />Dublin voters approved the East Dublin Specific Plan and the first annexation was in 1994. It <br />became clear to DSRSD that it had a commitment to serve the planned expansion of Dublin. <br />In 1994/1995 it was recommended that year round recycling was the best approach in the form <br />of reverse osmosis and groundwater injection. The DSRSD Board approved this. In 1995 Dave <br />Requa joined DSRSD and put together the project team, which had a wide range of expertise. <br />In 1997, after $1.75 million was spent studying the groundwater, modeling the movement of the <br />groundwater and studying the impacts of the project on the community, the EIR was approved. <br />The LAVWMA Principles of Agreement were approved approximately two months later. <br />DSRSD believes this project is an a~set to the community; this is very high quality water. <br />DSRSD likes this type of a project because it serves two customers: the wastewater customer <br />anti ultimately the potable water customer. DSRSD realizes it needs to educate the community <br />so the community shares DSRSD's enthusiasm and confidence. <br /> <br /> Dave Requa, Engineering Manager of DSRSD, described how the Clean Water Revival <br />Project works. He explained the need for the project, provided a project description, described <br />the quality and benefits of other similar projects and described, Valley agency participation and <br />public education. He said the current import of water is approximately 85 percent: import will <br />increase in the next twenty-five years. He said sewer capacity has increased over the last several <br />years and it is extremely high this year. DSRSD has been able to prevent overflow by the use <br />of dedicated land disposal sites. But this has caused odor problems in the neighborhood and <br />limits the ability to dispose of sludge. He explained that the injection into the groundwater will <br />only occur during the wet weather months. Even with the LAVWMA expansion, this project <br />will be beneficial if there are a number of wet weather months. He showed transparencies of <br />the project. He explained the treatment process the water will go through before it ends up <br />being injected into the ground and what happens to the water after it is injected. The process <br />will eliminate the bacteria and harmful elements. The water put into the groundwater meets <br />every drinking water standard and in fact is better quality than most valley water supplies. He <br />listed similar projects, two of which are the US Army and NASA. He said DSRSD and Zone <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 2 09/08/98 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.