My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090898
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN090898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 6:54:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/8/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 have been working together to provide the best possible project/solution. There have been <br />numerous workshops, public meetings, media coverage, etc. This project provides the key to <br />meet the needs of the City of Dublin in the short term; provides a salt management tool in the <br />longer term; and provides a part of managing the water resources as set forth in the LAVWMA <br />Principles of Agreement. <br /> <br /> Steve Gittings, Water Resources Manager, City of Livermore, gave a brief overview of <br />the RO system in the City of Livermore. The project' was initially evaluated and it was <br />determined that the RO microfiltration unit would be less expensive than additional pipelines. <br />The City wanted to see if a microfiltration system could be beneficial during the drought. He <br />felt the technology has proven itself. The public relations used by the City was similar to that <br />of San Ramon and Dublin. In 1989 the first citizens advisory committee was formed and more <br />recently Zone 7 formed a citizens groundwater advisory committee. He also mentioned the City <br />gives tours and public meetings to explain how the system works. In 1991 an additional export <br />pipeline analysis was done which continued to support the position that micro filtration was less <br />expensive than constructing additional pipelines. In 1991/1992, the City did a preliminary <br />design of an advanced reclamation plant and prepared a negative declaration. In 1992, the <br />recycling report supported the use of RO effluent for irrigation and groundwater injection. In <br />1994 the City started-micro~ltration and reverse osmosis testing and in 1994/1995 the advance <br />water reclamation facility design was done. In 1996/1997 the contract was awarded and the <br />project started. The City of Livermore to date has expended $7.682 million with an expected <br />additional $1.062 million in costs. These figures do not include the operations and maintenance <br />costs. The system has performed as predicted and the organics, metals and inorganics are far <br />below the drinking water minimum standards. He mentioned the equipment safeguards. The <br />system is run by a computer that has set points that will shut the system down automatically if <br />parameters that have been predetermined are exceeded. Example: if the PH changes in the <br />water, the units automatically shut down.. He said the water will travel approximately ten miles <br />from the injection point and will be in the ground approximately thirty to forty years before it <br />is extracted into the potable water source; therefore the water quality is excellent. <br /> <br /> John Stein, Livermore City Councilmember, said the City of Livermore has been reusing <br /> water on its golf course since 1966. The project that the City started for RO was a <br /> demonstration project for three reasons: 1) improving the salt balance; 2) increasing the sewer <br /> capacity of the system; and 3) providing water during periods of drought. The system has the <br /> support of DSRSD and Zone 7. He listed the criteria that were set before the injection could <br /> occur. The first requirement is that the RO plant operate successfully for six months without <br /> problems in the effluent; 2) a redundant examination of the plans for the plant be done by an <br /> outside consultant and 3) the City has the option, in the event of a failure, to turn off the plant. <br /> The City of Livermore has spent $7 million in the construction, design and operation of the RO <br /> facility. It appears to provide reusable water that meets or succeeds all the regulatory standards. <br /> It is currently being used to water the golf courses. The project is necessary to demonstrate to <br /> the public that water reuse is an important component for the State of California to meet its <br /> projected water needs. Even without future growth there is no guarantee that the State water <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 3 09/08/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.