CCMIN061698 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Michelotti understood the line to follow the topography. Mr. Pico said the line is more of an issue on the Chapman property. In light of the comments heard tonight, let the property owners make the choice. Ms. Dennis asked staff if it was okay to allow the property owners to make a choice. Mr. Swift said that was okay. The consensus was to allow the property owners the opportunity to make a choice, between the UGB location shown on the General Plan and the UGH location shown on Attachment 3. 4. Phased annexation of lots south of Happy Valley Road Mr. Rasmussen felt this was a minor issue. Staff's recommendation is to annex all the property at the same time, not just the front half of the property. The property owners are asking to annex the front portion, the semi-rural density portion, with the remainder of the project and then work out an agricultural document that would address permitted uses and how to deal with odors, etc. Staff is recommending that the agricultural document be done prior to the annexation so the annexation process only has to be done once. Mr. Pico wanted to include Mr. Spotorno's advice and expertise in the above process. Ms. Michelotti said the property would be annexed according to current property lines. There was consensus as to the staff report recommendation. 5. Five-Acre Agricultural Parcels on Lots 119 (Schaffer) and 124 (Grotenhuis/Chapman) Mr. Rasmussen said number five relates to the action taken on number one. The staff proposal allows a limited density increase (and a one lot density transfer for lot 119) if there is an open space easement dedicated. There was consensus to support the staff report recommendation. 6. Trail 7 (Minnie Road) Mayor Tarver did not care if the trail was deleted. Ms. Dennis wanted the trail. She felt trails were really important. She felt trails did not have the impact people thought they would. Pleasanton City Council 24 06/16/98 Minutes