My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060498
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN060498
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 4:46:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/4/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dunston said if the OPSC portion is eliminated and the whole process is streamlined <br />it would take approximately one year out of the process. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis said if there is no money available is it possible to skip that step and be <br />reimbursed at a later date. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dunston said yes as long as the process stays within the guidelines of the OPSC and <br />the approvals of the construction phase are received. The process he has explained will take <br />approximately two to three years and that process includes Phase C zero and future funding. <br /> <br /> Ms. Haugen asked if the state bond does not pass how will the funding be accomplished. <br /> <br /> Mr. McCurtain said the City, School Board, and the Developers negotiated a <br />homebuilders agreement for fees that would be above and beyond the state minimum. He said <br />right now there are developer fees in place that are funding all the schools in Pleasanton. The <br />School District still applies for state funding and when there are funds available it is an added <br />cash flow benefit that will help build schools sooner. The developer fee agreement is an <br />umbrella agreement that says if there are no additional funds coming into the School District, <br />the developer fees collected will provide sufficient funds to build all the schools. The issue then <br />becomes timing, when the fees are collected and when the schools can be built. <br /> <br /> Bill James said very little time is left to build the school by the year 2000. He has been <br />fighting the process for over twenty-two years. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala felt it was important for the public to know the process. She wanted everyone <br />to work together to solve the time problem. <br /> <br /> Mr. James said more agencies, such as the League of California Cities, CSBA, CTA, <br />etc., need to get involved. <br /> <br /> Ms. Haugen said Mike Sweeney has been very actively working for the City and the <br />School District at the legislative level. This is a very difficult issue because there is a <br />considerable amount of fear throughout the state and things change on a daily basis. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern said the public should not be concerned if the bond measure does not pass <br />in November because there is funding from the developer fees to build the schools. Within the <br />developer fees there is approximately $9.95 million for the elementary school and $19.67 million <br />for the middle school. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked if there was anything to add regarding the traffic on this site. <br /> <br />Joint Meeting 10 06/04/98 <br />School Board/City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.