Laserfiche WebLink
Douglas Krah, 3825 Hopyard Road, #195, representing Standard Pacific, said the first <br />plan was approved in 1989 and many things have changed since then. He felt this is a better <br />project. This plan addresses concerns that have been heard over the last five years regarding <br />street configuration, short streets, no cul-de-sacs, separated sidewalks, getting garages off the <br />streets and other issues. He showed the changes that had been made. He had a concern <br />associated with growth management. The current schedule is to pull 38 building permits in 1999 <br />and if the reserve takes two years, it prevents him from building on the property and from <br />satisfying the growth management requirement. He asked that if the City takes the full two <br />years to make a decision that 12-15 units from growth management allocation be set aside so he <br />could use them. He said right now he has enough growth management allocations to build the <br />entire project as approved. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said the old plan located some of the open space and amenities in a better <br />location than the new plan. He wondered why these locations were moved. <br /> <br /> Mr. Krah said the new plan proposes that the location of the recreation center be by the <br />entrance. He thought this was a good location because it has a little bit more parking and it <br />allows the residences to be away from the noise of Stoneridge Drive and minimizes the units <br />impacted by the recreation center. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said the new plan has a substantial change in the floor area ratio. <br /> <br /> Mr. Krah said the floor area ratio of this proposed project are higher than the currently <br />approved project because of the way it was calculated and the parking area allowed. The <br />original plan had 146 units averaging 1850 square feet and the new plan has 143 units, averaging <br />1850 square feet, on the same acreage, so the floor area ratio is higher. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if the price of the homes would stay the same. <br /> <br /> Mr. Krah said if the market stays the way it is, the range would be $300,000 to the low <br /> $400,000. He said Pleasanton is a desirable place to live and the market supports that. When <br /> Village I was built a single family detached home on a 5,000 square foot lot would not even sell <br /> for $250,000. The market has since exploded and supports units in the $300,000 and $400,000 <br /> range. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if his concern with changing Condition No. 28 related directly to <br /> growth management approvals and setting aside units or would he prefer that Council did not <br /> encumber his project with the decision making. <br /> <br /> Mr. Krah said the latter. He raised the same concern at the Planning Commission <br /> meeting. He is ready to go forward with this project, but because of the condition he can't. <br /> He hoped that the Council would give some grace period or allow him to carry those units <br /> forward. It is his intention to use the units. He is comfortable with the two year period but <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 22 05/19/98 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />