Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Holt said she was not against what was originally approved but what Staples Ranch <br />had become. She wanted to know how the plan went from a 17.2 acre community park with <br />medium density homes to a 35 acre sports park with high and medium density homes and cut <br />through traffic. <br /> <br /> Matt Sullivan, 4324 Muirwood Drive, said the residents do not want any more piecemeal <br />approvals that has negative impacts on existing neighborhoods, schools, traffic and the <br />environment. The scope of this study should be comprehensive and include all the General Plan <br />elements, including land use, circulation, housing, public safety, facilities, conservation, open <br />space, community character, etc. The area should be planned as a whole and impacts to the <br />overall city, as well as regional impacts, should be evaluated. He felt the Stoneridge <br />Drive/Staples Ranch area needed to be part of the plan. The connection of Stoneridge to El <br />Charro is an essential issue that needed to be evaluated and the proposed land use and circulation <br />elements will have an overriding effect on the east side as a whole. These two areas cannot be <br />planned side by side without their integration. The study should be conducted by an advisory <br />committee to the City Council. It should be an open and public process with access by all <br />stakeholders and the makeup of this committee is very crucial. He asked, "Who does the city <br />represent and whose best interest have the voters trusted to the City Council?" The answer to <br />these questions will be the makeup of the committee. He supported the idea of using <br />independent consultants selected by the committee. He believed this study would provide a <br />wonderful opportunity to plan for the future. <br /> <br /> Steve Belecky, 3644 Kamp Drive, felt Staples Ranch should be included in the study <br />because it is a residential corridor. His main concern was that he did not get full consideration <br />from the Planning Commission and felt the will of the people needed to be taken into <br />consideration. He did not want to see a six lane roadway going through a residential area. He <br />understood the school problem needed to be taken up with the School Board, but also felt it was <br />Council's responsibility to do what it could. He did not like the use of modulars to house the <br />students. He said something needed to be done in order to preserve the quality of life everyone <br />has come to love in Pleasanton. He reiterated that the study needed to include Staples Ranch <br />and only to allow the Standard Pacific development to move ahead. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said the Stoneridge Specific Plan was designed for Stoneridge Drive to <br /> have six lanes, however when it came through, only four lanes were implemented and approved. <br /> There was additional landscaping and a soundwall constructed. The intention is that this would <br /> remain at four lanes even when connecting to E1 Charro. There is room for expansion in the <br /> future but that is not foreseeable at this time. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said the projected traffic volumes on Stoneridge Drive are slightly above what <br /> is necessary to turn four lanes into six lanes. It was constructed with four lanes with the <br /> flexibility to go to six lanes if traffic volumes increase. <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 15 05/05/98 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />