My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN040798
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN040798
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 4:08:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/7/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />Item 6a <br />Analysis of arterial cut-through traffic. (SR98:58) <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said the report verified that the original analysis is close to what exists. <br />He would like to look at the 1997 traffic volumes and compare this data against the data in the <br />staff report. <br /> <br /> Bill van Gelder said the staff report contained a bar graph that showed the number of cut- <br />throughs along side the total traffic during peak times. In regards to the cut-through routes <br />themselves there is another bar graph that showed the percentages against the total volumes. He <br />said he would provide the backup data for Council's review. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if there was any way to compare this projection with previous <br />projections to determine what areas needed to be worked on. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder understood what the Mayor was looking for and he would have liked the <br />model to be that accurate. He said the model is based upon existing traffic with a projection of <br />five years in the future and assumptions that different projects would be built. He said seldom <br />does the land use actually get developed the same way it is projected in the model. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if the numbers could be factored out for the projects that did not get <br />built? He would like to see if the projection for 1993 plus five years were actually the proposed <br />numbers for 1998. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said the numbers in the first study done were validated by the second <br />study. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder felt confident the Pleasanton traffic model was accurate in its projection. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti had a question regarding staff's third recommendation "the option of ramp <br />metering ". She said she was not in favor of ramp metering. She did not want to impose ramp <br />metering prematurely and there were two speakers at the last meeting that opposed ramp <br />metering. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder said staff's recommendation is to consider, analyze, and determine if <br />ramp metering would fit into any proposals for the City. He said the regional agencies will be <br />pursuing ramp metering and for that reason it was included in the report. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 4/7/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.