Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Tarver understood the secondary lot for employees would be gated. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said it would have a card entry. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> Jerry Wagner, 4043 Nevis Street, read from a previous staff report denying his request <br />to add an additional space to his trailer park, based on the following: 1) staff does not believe <br />that enlarging a non-conforming use by adding a 33rd space as proposed would be consistent <br />with the land uses and character of the surrounding neighborhood; 2) the enlargement of this <br />existing non-conforming use could result in potential adverse impacts such as noise, traffic, etc. <br />on the surrounding properties. The primary concern in reviewing a conditional use permit <br />application is the effect of a proposed use on surrounding land uses. As stated above, the <br />mobile home park is in a predominantly residential area; and 3) this difference would create <br />noise and traffic generated by the high turnover of park users. He was dismayed that barely a <br />year ago Stanley was considered a predominately residential area and now staff is saying a thirty <br />space parking lot and a 16,000 sq.ft. business building is okay. He showed a map of Stanley <br />Boulevard. He said most of the housing on Stanley Boulevard is owned by senior citizens and <br />some apartment units. He felt the residents should not have to put up with the parking from the <br />bank in a residential area. The owner of the apartments should not have to reduce his rents <br />because of the noise and pollution created by the parking lot. He said people would cross <br />Stanley at an unsafe spot rather than go to the crosswalk to cross, and traffic will make unsafe <br />U-turns. He indicated other areas that could be used for parking and the bank that might <br />alleviate some of the traffic problems. He felt Stanley should not be subjected to the increased <br />traffic when a different solution might keep half of the traffic off of Stanley. He felt a business <br />should not be allowed unless it has its own parking. He did not support the in-lieu fees. He <br />asked if staff had heard from the residents on Stanley Boulevard. He said more time was spent <br />on saving the Heritage trees than the residents on Stanley. He t~lt the rezoning of the lot at <br />4287 Stanley, the 3,000 foot expansion, and the code amendment should not be done. The City <br />has a moral obligation to consider the residents living on Stanley. <br /> <br /> Christopher Schlies, 699 Peters Avenue, Suite B, said Mr. Wagner did not receive notice <br />when this whole process started. Mr. Wagner is raising concerns that could have been dealt <br />with when the 13,000 sq.ft. building was approved. He would like Council to consider the <br />points raised here this evening before making a f'mal decision. He identified three concerns that <br />Mr. Wagner has: 1) people turning right out of the parking lot and making a U-turn at the park; <br />(he submitted photographs showing the limited area to turn around). Mr. Wagner is asking at <br />the very least to have "No U-turn" signs posted; 2) there will be increased traffic and parking <br />problems along Stanley Boulevard. He said a formal traffic study has not been done, rather staff <br />is referring to other reports. Mr. Wagner reminded Council that just over a year ago a few <br />extra trips generated by a few RV's coming into his mobile home park would have a negative <br />impact on the residential area; and, 3) the conversion of the residences to the parking lot will <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 17 08/18/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />