My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052198
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN052198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
10/29/1998 5:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Tarver said if the second phase were west to south, what would it do to the <br />configuration? <br /> <br /> Mr. Homolka said if someone was to get off of Stoneridge the flyover will come up and <br />over and land after the exit. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver suggested looking at the Hopyard Road solution to the flyover going in <br />the opposite direction and try and use the same design, it would probably work. <br /> <br /> Mr. Homolka said he had a meeting with Caltrans regarding that. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said the access to Stoneridge Drive is cut off and the access eastward <br />from Stoneridge is cut off. <br /> <br /> Mr. Homolka said there will be no access to or from Stoneridge Drive. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said in the foreseeable future or until such time as the second phase can <br />be funded, traffic on Stoneridge Drive will fly over the exit that is going east and west. <br /> <br /> Mr. Homolka said in this scenario the east/west exit is lost but in the other scenario just <br />the east is lost. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver felt traffic could fly over the eastbound exit off 1-680 to get to 1-580 but <br />still pick up the westbound exit. <br /> <br /> Mr. Homolka said the committee was looking at the problem with exiting Pleasanton <br />northbound ramp. The committee's proposal maximizes the exit. Proposal B retains some of <br />the access to the west and is building into Caltrans long term plan. Also it might be refundable. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said if Highway 84 is funded and takes significant capacity off of the 1-680 <br />south direction, then the traffic would be reduced at the 1-580/I-680 interchange going <br />eastbound. <br /> <br /> Mr. Homolka said the committee does not know how many of the interchanges fail under <br />the scenarios. The committee has preliminary analysis but it does not know what will really <br />happen. The proposals get the traffic to the freeway, the concern now is whether the traffic will <br />be able to get on the freeway. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked how the committee would determine the amount of traffic. <br /> <br /> Mr. Homolka said the consultant will use the Tri-Valley model. The model predicts <br />demand rather than constrained volumes. The committee will work with Caltrans to determine <br />what are the realistic constraints. The committee needs to find what realities are as far as <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 6 05/21/98 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.