My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 88456
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
RES 88456
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2012 1:31:09 PM
Creation date
12/1/1999 11:51:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Finalize the Job Analysis <br /> <br />After the workshop, Biddle & Associates will make changes to the job analysis <br />as specified by the subject-matter experts and produce a City-specific, job- <br />specific job analysis for the position of entry-level police officer. <br /> <br />Biddle & Associates will also produce a selection plan matrix for the City's <br />police officer selection process. <br /> <br />D. Interview Development Workshop <br /> <br />We recommend a structured oral interview consisting of an oral board asking <br />situational questions of the candidates. Each question presents a situation <br />or problem which has actually occurred on the job. Candidates' responses are <br />not evaluated in terms of knowing departmental policies or procedures. <br />Instead the responses are evaluated in terms of the abilities that the <br />interview is designed to measure, as determined through the selection plan. <br />Typically, abilities such as oral communication, interpersonal skills and <br />decision-making are evaluated in an oral interview for entry-level police <br />officer. Behaviorally-anchored rating scales will be developed for the oral <br />board to use in evaluating the candidates' abilities. Therefore, =as a <br />candidate is using, for example, decision-making ability in order to respond <br />to a hypothetical question, the oral board is evaluating the decision-making <br />ability in terms of the behaviorally-anchored rating scale which clearly <br />describes to them how to evaluate the ability. The oral board is also <br />provided with characteristics of a strong candidate response and a weak <br />candidate response. <br /> <br />As part of a cooperative study that Biddle & Associates conducted with <br />jurisdictions in Southern California, twenty structured oral interview <br />questions were developed. Biddle & Associates will conduct a two day <br />workshop with the City's subject-matter experts in order to review these <br />questions and develop new ones as needed. See Attachment #8 for a sample <br />structured oral interview question. Beginning with the twenty questions <br />already developed, we will guide the subject-matter experts in a review of <br />each situation and the corresponding characteristics of strong and weak <br />responses. The subject-matter experts will modify them, if necessary, to <br />reflect a situation as it would most likely be encountered in the City of <br />Pleasanton. Questions that are not relevant to the City of Pleasanton will <br />be revised, if feasible, and if not feasible will be eliminated and new ones <br />developed to replace them until a total of 12 job-related questions are <br />developed with this process. <br /> <br />After reviewing, revising or replacing the questions, the rating scale will <br />be reviewed, revised or developed. The rating scale will include a <br />behaviorally-anchored (described in terms of behaviors exhibited) rating <br />scale for each ability being measured. Instructions will be developed <br />including a final scoring sheet on which scores for each ability being <br />measured are recorded. The cutoff will be determined as part of the scoring <br />development. <br /> <br />Biddle & Associates 4 8/31/88 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.