Laserfiche WebLink
EXAIBIT A <br />Significant Effects and Findings <br />For purposes of this Exhibit, the Hacienda Business Park <br />is referred to as the "Project" and the Amendment to the Growth <br />Management Element is referred to as the "Amendment". <br />I. Land Use and Planning. <br />A. Significant Effect. Potential regional surplus of <br />land committed to commercial/industrial development <br />resulting in delay in Project buildout or abandonment <br />of Project in partially built state. <br />a.l Finding. Phasing of Project development is <br />infeasible due to economic considerations. <br />a.2 Fact. Allowing Developer to develop and market <br />the Project as market conditions dictate will <br />minimize the likelihood of delay in Project <br />buildout o'r abandonment of the Project in a <br />partial].p built state. Different uses are <br />located' throughout the Project making phased <br />development impractical. <br />a.3 Fact. The Project is located at the inter- <br />section of I-580 and I-680, an area well suited <br />for large scale urban infill and more likely <br />than less favored locations to build-out as <br />scheduled. <br />a.4 Fact. The notion of phased project development <br />is inconsistent with City's requirement that the <br />public improvements related to the Project be <br />built in one phase. <br />a.5 Finding. The Residential Community Alternative, <br />Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No <br />Project Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the potential signi- <br />ficant effect. However, each of these Alterna- <br />tives is infeasible. <br />a.6 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of <br />these Alternatives.) <br />1. <br />