Laserfiche WebLink
d.9 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of <br />Alternatives). <br />d. 10 Fact. See Sections IV.d.4, IV.d.5, IV.d.7 (Fire <br />and Police Services Mitigations). <br />V. Noise. <br />A. Significant Effect. Construction noise near <br />residential receptors. <br />a.l Findinq. The mitigation measures incorporated <br />in the Project to decrease noise levels will <br />substantially lessen the effect. <br />a.2 Fact. Condition No. 105 requires truck traffic <br />to use through on-site streets to Hopyard Road, <br />avoiding all residential uses. <br />a.3 Fact. Condition No. 86 regulates haul routes <br />during construction. <br />a.4 Fact. City has adopted noise ordinances regu- <br />lating construction activities. <br />B. Significant Effect. Potential noise impact on ad- <br />joining residential area near proposed warehouse. <br />b.l Finding. Effect will be avoided because it is <br />doubtful that the Project will include rail- <br />served uses and noise levels are regulated by <br />ordinance. <br />b.2 Fact. Train route may be abandoned by Southern <br />Pacific, with no rail service to proposed ware- <br />house area. Therefore, the site is unlikely to <br />have noisy warehouse. use. <br />b.3 Fact. City Noise Ordinance establishes limits <br />to noise beyond the property plane of an indus- <br />trial area. <br />C. Significant Effect. Increased noise levels at resi- <br />dences along portions of I-680, I-580, Santa Rita <br />Road, Stoneridqe Drive, TA. Las Positas Blvd., and <br />Hopyard Road. <br />c.l Findinq. Mitigation measures to achieve accept- <br />able residential noise levels incorporated into <br />12. <br />