Laserfiche WebLink
Fire Code and nationally recognized <br />standards. (Nos. 26, 31, 32.) <br />(2) Buildings shall have alarms as required and <br />visible street numbers, fire hydrant <br />locations shall be marked. (Nos. 46, 33, <br />30.) <br />(3) Procedure for the safe handling and storage <br />of combustible or exAlosive materials will <br />be established. (No. 51.) <br />(4) Fire hazards shall be minimized within the <br />bounds of the Project site. (Nos. 28, 29, <br />103, 47.) <br />(5) The Developer shall provide on-site private <br />security guards as determined by the Police <br />Chief. (No. 54.) <br />d.3 Finding. Pursuant to a Mitigation Agreement <br />between City and Developer, Developer has agreed <br />to contribute to the required funding of <br />required fire stations, equipment and personnel. <br />d.4 Fact. The Mitigation Agreement has been <br />recorded against the Property. <br />d.5 Fact. The petition to form the North Pleasanton <br />Fire Improvement District ("NPFID") has been <br />completed and work on forming the NPFID has <br />begun. <br />d.5 Findin Project revenues will be greater than <br />Project costs for all City services, including <br />police and fire services. <br />d.7 Fact. As shown in the North Pleasanton Fiscal <br />Impact Report (April, 1982), increased revenues <br />from development will exceed expenditures re- <br />quired to service new development. <br />d.8 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development <br />Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial <br />Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the effect. However, <br />each of these Alternatives is infeasible and <br />unnecessary as the mitigation measures incorpo- <br />rated into the Project will substantially lessen <br />the significant effect. <br />11. <br />