My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2382
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
2382
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2009 12:38:23 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 11:43:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/9/1983
DOCUMENT NO
2382
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-81-30
NOTES
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA AND CALLAHAN-PENTZ
NOTES 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OF A 573 ACRE PORJECT HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK
NOTES 3
PLEASANTON
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c.2 Fact. Condition No. 21 provides that building <br />permits may be withheld by the City if sewer <br />capacity is not available. <br />c.3 Fact. See Sections IV.b.2 and IV.b.7 (Water <br />saving measures which minimize effluents). <br />c.4 Findinq. A mitigation measure which has not <br />been incorporated into the Project concerning <br />construction of other sewer effluent disposal <br />facilities is not within the jurisdiction of <br />City. The recommended mitigation measure is <br />within the jurisdiction of other public agencies <br />and can and should be adopted. <br />c.5 Fact. Construction of sewer effluent trans- <br />portation and disposal facilities is within the <br />control of DSRSD, LAVWMA and EBDA. As a member <br />agency in LAVWMA and by agreement with DSRSD, <br />City may participate in the decisions to expand <br />facilities, and, pursuant to existing General <br />Plan policies, City has urged such construction. <br />c.6 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development <br />Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial <br />Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the effect. However, <br />each of these Alternatives is infeasible and <br />unnecessary as effects concerning water use <br />demand are significantly lessened by the miti- <br />gation measures incorporated into the Project. <br />c.7 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of <br />Alternatives). <br />c.8 Fact. See Sections IV.c.2 and IV.c.3 (Sewer <br />effluent mitigation). <br />D. Significant Effect. Increase in police and fire <br />protection services will be required. <br />d.l Findinq. The recommended mitigation measures <br />incorporated into the Project to decrease demand <br />on police and fire protection services will <br />substantially lessen the effect. <br />d. 7_ Fact. The following Conditions have been <br />incorporated into the Project: <br />(1) The Project and individual sites shall be <br />subject to the provisions of the City's <br />10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.