Laserfiche WebLink
incorporated into the Project will substantially <br />lessen the significant effect. <br />B. <br />C. <br />a.6 Fact. See Section Xii (for infeasibility of <br />Alternatives). <br />a.7 Fact. See Sections IV.a.4, IV.a.2 (Water demand <br />mitigations). <br />Significant Effect. Large increase in water use on <br />site. <br />b.l Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated <br />into the Project to control water use will <br />substantially lessen the effect. <br />b.7 Fact. Condition No. 48 requires installation of <br />water conserving plumbing fixtures. <br />b.3 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development <br />Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial <br />Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the effect. However, <br />each of these Alternatives is infeasible and <br />unnecessary as the mitigation measures incor- <br />porated into the Project will substantially <br />lessen the significant effect. <br />b.4 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of <br />Alternatives), <br />b.5 Fact. See Section IV.b.2 (Water conservation <br />mitigations). <br />b.6 Findin The recommended mitigation measures, <br />of minimizing landscaping water use and indus- <br />trial water use, are unnecessary. <br />b.7 Fact. Economic impact of wastewater connection <br />and use fees will encourage minimization of <br />industrial water use. There is sufficient water <br />supply to meet the projected demand. <br />Significant Effect. Generation of sewage effluent <br />beyond capacity available to the site. <br />c.l Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated <br />into the Project to control generation of sewage <br />effluent will substantially lessen the effect. <br />9. <br />