My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2382
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
2382
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2009 12:38:23 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 11:43:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/9/1983
DOCUMENT NO
2382
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-81-30
NOTES
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA AND CALLAHAN-PENTZ
NOTES 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OF A 573 ACRE PORJECT HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK
NOTES 3
PLEASANTON
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e.l Finding. Residential growth in Pleasanton is <br />regulated as an air quality mitigation measure, <br />and is consistent with the Bay Area Air Quality <br />Management Plan, substantially lessening the <br />effect. Compliance with oxidant standards is <br />projected in the near future. <br />e.2 Fact. The General Plan policies of growth <br />management limit growth in compliance with air <br />quality requirements for sewer expansion <br />grants. The Air Quality Management Plan is <br />based on this growth rate for Pleasanton and <br />other Tri-Valley communities served by the same <br />facilities. <br />e.3 The Air Quality Management Plan projects com- <br />pliance with oxidant standards by 1987. <br />IV. Public Services. <br />A. Significant Effect. Water use demand exceeding <br />existing distribution capacity. <br />a.l Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated <br />into the Project to require sufficient water <br />will avoid the effect. <br />a.2 Fact. Condition 27 provides each building must <br />have an adequate supply before it is con- <br />structed. <br />a.3 Finding. Additional distribution facilities <br />which will eliminate the effect have been <br />identified and will be financed by the North <br />Pleasanton Water Improvement District ("NPWID") <br />a.4. Fact. Developer, by agreement, is obligated, in <br />conjunction with other North Pleasanton de- <br />velopers, to fund the water distribution facili- <br />ties necessary for North Pleasanton area de- <br />velopment. Initial work on the formation of the <br />district has begun, construction has been <br />authorized for some facilities, and improvements <br />are anticipated to be completed in 1986. <br />a.5 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development <br />Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial <br />Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the effect. However, <br />each of these Alternatives is infeasible and <br />unnecessary as the mitigation measures <br />8. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.