Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton to about a two percent growth in population per year <br />for the next twenty years. In addition to the above, efforts to <br />improve other facilities have also been made. Park development has <br />proceeded at a sloca rate as has street, storm drainage, and water <br />improvements. The city has attempted to augment its own funds through <br />grants for many needed improvements and will continue to do so. <br />Infrastructure improvements will continue in the future, as planned <br />in the capital improvement schedule, in an attempt to catch up to the <br />level of service needed by Pleasanton's current residents and to keep <br />pace with new growth. <br />While the city is struggling to upgrade its services to a level com- <br />mensurate with the need of its residents, developers are poised for a <br />new phase of rapid residential development once sewage capacity <br />becomes available. Pleasanton can no more accommodate such growth now <br />than it could in the late 1960's. Rapid growth would exacerbate the <br />problems of inadequate parks and street systems. It would increase the <br />air quality problem and reduce the possibility of achieving federal <br />air quality standards in this century. It could again be inappro- <br />priately located vis a vis other development, adversely affecting <br />agricultural uses and inefficiently extending facilities to serve it, <br />possibly necessitating major, costly capital improvements unnecessary <br />for a more rational, logical growth pattern. It could also interfere <br />with the growth of commercial and industrial enterprises in Pleasanton <br />which are necessary to create a balanced community and to reduce the <br />adverse environmental consequences of the commuter pattern presently <br />existing and which, of necessity, would continue with rapid resi- <br />dential growth. In order to avoid .the consequences of past rapid <br />development while accommodating new growth and continuing to improve <br />present services, Pleasanton has adopted a series of goals and <br />policies relevant to new development cahich, when implemented, should <br />help alleviate the avoidable consequences of the past rapid develop- <br />ment. These goals and policy statements form the heart of this <br />"Growth Management Element." <br />This element contains the goals and policies relevant to new develop- <br />ment. It contains the city's basic stance with respect to balanced <br />community growth and the location of new development in the twenty <br />year period ending in 1996 and at the ultimate development of the <br />planning area. It also presents the city's position relative to the <br />residential growth rate, the type and location of new residential <br />development, and the environmental and socio-economic consequences <br />of new residential development. Earh of the following sections <br />summarizes the particular issues relevant to that topic, examines <br />solutions to possible problems, and concludes with the city°s policy <br />with respect to that topic. Taken together, the goals and policies <br />are designed to foster rational, efficient development which will <br />hasten solutions to the problems associated with development rather <br />than exacerbate these problems. <br />-3- <br />