Laserfiche WebLink
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />a. October 18, 2006 Minutes <br />Acting Chairperson Fox noted that with respect to Commissioner O'Connor's proposed <br />amendment on the last pazagraph of page 8, City staff indicated that because FAR was <br />measured with respect to livable space in the Pleasanton Municipal Code, they would not <br />recommend including an amendment that indicated anon-standazd, non-Municipal-Code <br />definition of FAR. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that staff did not try to include anon-standard definition. <br />Ms. Decker noted that the particulaz conditions were related to specific PUDs, and she <br />noted that staff could check the tape to discern whether there was further relevant <br />discussion to include in the minutes. She did not recall any of the discussion leaning <br />towazds not being appropriate per Code as had been done in the past. <br />The minutes of October 18, 2006, were approved as amended. <br />b. October 25, 2006 Minutes <br />Acting Chairperson Fox wished to include Kevin Close's eazlier remazks to the last <br />paragraph of page 1 that if Heartwood Communities wanted to be considered as part of <br />the Happy Valley Golf Course '~~`-~"~a '°'°" `~°'°" """°" ""°" ~e Happy <br />Yr> > <br />Valley Specific Plan will need to be amended. <br />Acting Chairperson Fox noted that the fifth pazagraph on page 13 should be changed to <br />read as follows: "Acting Chairperson Fox noted a memo dated October 23, received on <br />the dais from Planning Director Jerry Iserson addressing the "blob" and indicating a <br />change in the staff's interpretation of the "blob " to be more of a precise location, rather <br />than a general location, following a conversation with Wayne Rasmussen. "She noted <br />that the memo was not included in the packet and wished to ensure that the City Council <br />understood this when it received the minutes. <br />Commissioner Peazce believed the date of the memo would be sufficient to identify the <br />document and ascertain the content. <br />Ms. Decker advised that the minutes were generated from comments made during the <br />meeting. She advised that the minutes were an account of what occurred during the <br />meeting, and were not intended to be verbatim; nor can the record be changed to reflect a <br />statement with more clazity if it was not actually stated as such at the time. She noted <br />that staff would check the audiotape to determine what Acting Chairperson Fox actually <br />said in reference to the memo. <br />Commissioner Blattk noted that the item in question was a workshop and would not go to <br />the Council. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 29, 2006 Page 26 of 28 <br />