PC 112906 - Laserfiche WebLink

Acting Chairperson Fox noted that it would eventually go to the Council and wished to clazify potential questions. Commissioner Peazce advised that the third sentence of the first paragraph under Item No. 1 on page 16 should be modified to read as follows: "She believed the blob een€errned-should conform to the intent of the Specific Plan, which discussed `preserving natural features of ridgelines, hilltops, oak woodland creeks and steep slopes."' Ms. Decker advised that staff would check the audiotape to confirm that statement. Commissioner Pearce requested that the last sentence of the first paragraph under Item No. 5 on page 18 should be modified to read as follows: "She appreciated the visuals presented by the applicants, and while she preferred that the neighbors not see the house at all, she realized that iveeld might not be possible." Acting Chairperson Fox noted that with respect to the last sentence of the third pazagraph on page 19 which reads "She noted that while she liked the project, she believed the projects should be consistent with the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan with respect to hillside building,..." she wanted it clarified that she was referring to the Remick project and not the Sarich home. She requested that staff review the tape for confirmation. Commissioner Blank noted that having the audio of the meeting available as a podcast would make such requests easier to fulfill. Commissioner Olson recalled Acting Chairperson Fox stating that she really liked the project. The minutes of October 25, 2006, were approved as amended. 8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'SREVIEW/ACTION a. Future Planning Calendar Acting Chairperson Fox requested that tentative dates be included on the Future Planning Calendar. Commissioner O'Connor noted that the newspaper occasionally printed information on the schedule, which was not always accurate. Ms. Decker noted that the Planning Department maintained a tentative but fluid schedule. For that reason, placing dates for the Planning Commission would perhaps raise expectations that projects were actually scheduled which may not occur due to unforeseen circumstances by either the applicant or new knowledge from staff. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 29, 2006 Page 27 of 28