PC 112906 - Laserfiche WebLink

With respect to the question on potential bike-lane reduction, Ms. Decker advised that the minimum width was technically three feet; in this case, four feet met the criteria. Acting Chairperson Fox indicated that she believed that a few years ago in the Traffic Committee Minutes, Jeff Knowles suggested taking some bike lanes off of Stoneridge Drive, and it was brought to a previous Council's attention roughly three yeazs ago, but there was discussion that this should not occur. She indicated that if there was a reduction in the width of the bike lanes, she was concerned that the City Council be able to see that that was a component of the Planning Commission decision in the text. Ms. Decker indicated that the City Council would not need to know and it would not be forwazded to them. Ms. Decker also clarified there would be parking on Stoneridge Drive from Rheem Drive until the easterly boundary of the current Church property. Commissioner Blank moved to make the variance findings listed in the staff report and approve Case No. PDR-561/PV-158 subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B of the staff report, as recommended by staff, with the following amendments: 1. Modify Condition No. 19 to indicate that noise from the mechanical equipment shall not exceed 60 dBA at the property plane; 2. Add a new condition that additional trees shall be planted on both sides of the walkway on the western side of the parish center building; 3. Add a new conditions that atwo-inch diameter capped conduit shall be installed in the roof for emergency purposes, the location of which shall be subject to the review and approval of the Chief Building Official; 4. Add a new condition that the City Traffic Engineer shall consider appropriate mitigation measures on Rheem Drive to address the neighbors' traffic concerns; 5. Add a new condition that additional large trees shall be planted in the southern planter area to further mitigate both noise and visual impacts of the Church property to the southern residential area, with the fmal location, species, and size of the trees to be shown on the plans submitted for issuance of building permits and subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits; and 6. Add a new condition that if the Planning Director determines that the off-site parking at 2174-2186 Rheem Drive is not being effectively used by the Church, the applicants shall work with the Planning Director to investigate options to increase the effectiveness of the off-site parking lot; and if the Planning Director determines that this off-site parking lot continues not to be used, the Planning Director may inform the Church to construct an on-site gravel parking lot in the undeveloped eastern side of the Church site to accommodate the overflow parking within 60 days, the exact location aad design of which shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation. Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion and suggested an amendment to remove parking on Stoneridge Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 29, 2006 Page 20 of 28