My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092706
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 092706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:26:39 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:00:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/27/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092706
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank inquired when projects aze required to comply with new ordinances. <br />Ms. Hangman replied that projects must meet the applicable codes at the time of project <br />approval. <br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. Community Character Element of the General Plan <br />Review and provide comment on a Draft Community Chazacter Element of the <br />General Plan. <br />Ms. Stern summarized the staff report and described the highlights of this optional element, <br />including the added pazagraph in the Overview section on sustainability and how it related to <br />community character; added information about community chazacter challenges such as <br />keeping open space and community separation as Pleasanton develops in the future; and <br />updating information on streetscapes, patterns and architectural style. Information was also <br />added on historic resources, residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, and agriculture. <br />The Public Improvements and Maintenance section was added, including information on the <br />arroyos and canals, which added to the City's identity; maintenance information was also <br />included. References were added to the Downtown Specific Plan, the Design Guidelines, <br />and Downtown events. The design of residential and high-density neighborhoods would be <br />improved, and there would be the removal of power lines, particularly in residential areas; <br />tree replacement and maintenance; and public maintenance of streets and sidewalks. Home <br />and yazd improvements would also be encouraged and recognized through cleanup or <br />competitive programs. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that on page X.1. regarding "land transitioning from dry land <br />agriculture to urban uses on the Staples Ranch property," she would like the word "urban" to <br />be deleted, which she believed gave the image of a huge city with a lot of commercial <br />development. She suggested the phrase "mixed use" instead. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that the document referred to the southern edge of the city as <br />Happy Valley and noted that Happy Valley was not officially in Pleasanton because it had <br />never been annexed. Ms. Stern replied that the General Plan generally looked at the entire <br />planning area boundary, which extended farther than the City limits. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 27, 2006 Page 3 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.