My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052406
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 052406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:24:13 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 9:37:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/24/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 052406
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Paee VII-40 <br />In response to Commissioner Blank's inquiry regazding whether "individual buildings <br />and sites "under Program 9.3 needed to be identified as either commercial or residential <br />for clarification purposes, Ms. Stern replied that no distinction is being made between the <br />two. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the terms "Wildlands Overlay" and "Open Space" <br />seemed to be used interchangeably and requested a definitional distinction between the <br />two. Ms. Stern explained that the "Open Space" designation included several different <br />types of open space such as for recreation or for grazing. She noted that some of those <br />open space areas, particulazly those that have steep slopes, have an overlay known as <br />"Wildlands Overlay." She clarified that changing some azeas from "Wildlands Overlay" <br />to "Open Space" opens up more azeas that would be subject to the policy and would <br />retain a broader ability to acquire land where opportunities azose as opposed to narrowing <br />them down to azeas covered only by "Wildlands Overlay." <br />Commissioner Fox noted that Program 10.1 might be a good place to insert the <br />Tri-Valley Conservancy section proposed by Ms. Roberts. Ms. Hanyman suggested that <br />the policy not be limited to the Conservancy but to keep it open to include other possible <br />groups. <br />Paee VII-41 <br />?"-' <br />In response to Commissioner Fox's request that the stricken phrase "ridgeline <br />preservation ordinance" be put back on Program 12.1, Ms. Stern replied that one already <br />exists. Commissioner Fox stated that there is a "Hillside Development Guidelines" but <br />the ordinance addresses only the Ridgelands on the west side of the City. She suggested <br />that the City of San Juan Capistrano's Conservation and Open Space Goa14 and <br />Policies 4.1, 5.2, and 5.3, be integrated as follows: <br />Goal: "Prevent incompatible development in azeas which should be preserved for <br />scenic, historic, conservation, or public safety purposes in order to <br />maintain community scale and identity." <br />Policies: <br />• Ensure that incompatible development is avoided in those areas which are <br />designated to be preserved for scenic, historic, conservation, or public <br />safety purposes. <br />Ensure that new development integrate and preserve areas designated for <br />scenic, historic, conservation, or public safety purposes. <br />Ensure that no buildings will encroach upon any ridgeline designated for <br />preservation. <br />Chairperson Arkin noted that he agrees with everything on the City of San Juan <br />Capistrano document and asked staff to look into Commissioner Fox's suggestion. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 24, 2006 Page 9 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.