PC 051006 - Laserfiche WebLink

(..~ In response to an inquiry by Ms. Decker regarding the Commission's preference for a street design, the Commission unanimously agreed on Option 4, a curvilineaz street with a sidewalk. Ms. Decker further asked if the Commission preferred a sepazated sidewalk and if so, what would sepazate the sidewalk. Commissioner Blank and Chairperson Arkin indicated they wanted it separated. Commissioner Fox liked Option 4 with the sidewalk or the staff recommendation of the meandering sidewalk as a second choice. With respect to the separation, she indicated that she would be in favor of what would go with a curvilinear street, as long as it is safe and acceptable to the neighbors. Ms. Decker indicated that a traffic analysis would accompany the PUD application when it comes back for Commission consideration. No action was taken. At this point, Ms. Harryman suggested that the Commission determine if it would like to address the remaining items, considering the lateness of the hour. She further suggested that should the Commission decide to continue the items, people in the audience who came to speak on the two items be allowed to speak. Commissioner Pearce did not believe the remaining items should be rushed. Commissioner Fox preferred that the remaining items be continued. Commissioner Pearce believed the speakers for the continued items should be allowed to speak first at the next meeting and that they should devote sufficient time to the issue. d. PUD-54. Threehand. LP/Reznick Property Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval to subdivide an approximately 20-acre site into eight-lots, consisting of seven single- family lots for custom homes and one lot for a City water tank. The property is located at 5 Windy Oaks Drive (formerly 1680 Vineyazd Avenue) in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area and is zoned PUD-HR/OS (Planned Unit Development -Hillside Residential/Open Space) District. Chairperson Arkin inquired whether there were any speakers in the audience who could not appeaz at the next meeting. Mr. Steve Brozosky requested to speak. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Steve Brozosky, 1 Brozosky Hill Way, requested to speak regazding Item 6.d. He indicated that he had submitted an email to the Commission and noted that most of the items had been resolved with the developers during the course of the meeting, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 10, 2006 Page 18 of 19