Laserfiche WebLink
~ particulazly with respect to the EVA. He did not believe sports courts should be placed in <br />the hills, which he believed would produce noise and light impacts. The staff cleared up <br />the disclosures and suggested that the disclosure regarding his pigs be included. He <br />noted that the pigs were not there yeaz-round, and some owners may not be aware that <br />they were there. He was satisfied with the visuals. He would like the building heights to <br />remain as they aze. He preferred putting trees in, instead of putting money into a forestry <br />fund. He had not had a chance to review the design guidelines and suggested tying it to <br />the tentative map. <br />Greg Remick, applicant for Item 6.d. noted that the road alignment matters because the <br />manner in which the property on which the water tank will sit gets paid for is by building <br />the road to a specification that allowed him to do his development. He noted that they <br />could not do the water tank until there is enough specs to trade documents and that the <br />road design must be addressed so the property to install the tank could be obtained. <br />Commissioner Arkin moved to continue Item 6.d., PUD-54, Threehand, LP/Reznick <br />Pro a ,and Item 6.e., PDR-520/PCUP-162. Citv of Pleasanton, to the next <br />Planning Commission meeting. <br />Commissioner Fox seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CAI <br />AYES: <br />!"~ NOES: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />RECUSED: <br />ABSENT: <br />.L VOTE: <br />Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, Olson, and Peazce. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br />The motion passed. Both public hearing items remained open. <br />12. ADJOURNMENT <br />Chairperson Arkin adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 11:24 p.m. <br />Respectfully, <br />DONNA DECKER <br />Secretary <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 10, 2006 Page 19 of 19 <br />