Laserfiche WebLink
~..,, Chairperson Arkin suggested taking a straw vote on whether to request staff or the <br />applicant to invest more time in looking at some kind of path leading out of the project, <br />such as along Trenery Drive or Martin Avenue, as an alternative to Cameron Avenue. <br />Commissioner Peazce indicated that she would be in favor of investing time to design a <br />path that would go along the fronts of houses. She noted, however, that she did not think <br />this was a possibility. Ms. Decker requested Commissioner Peazce to confirm that she <br />did not wish to have an analysis done for a path through the Selway property as this <br />would be a backyazd tunnel. Commissioner Peazce said yes. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he concurred with Commissioner Peazce's comment and <br />supported it. He added that if the Commission wished to invest more time in evaluating a <br />pedestrian walkway, it would make sense to look at Trenery Drive should there be a way <br />to make that pathway safe and effective. <br />Chairperson Arkin indicated that he would like some investigation done on the Trenery <br />Drive alternative. <br />Commissioner Fox did not want to spend any staff time on a pathway through the Selway <br />property or Trenery Drive. She would like staff and the applicant to spend their time <br />exclusively on the Cameron Avenue alignment and the sidewalk on Cameron Avenue. <br />Commissioner Olson agreed with Commissioner Fox's comments and did not want to ask <br />~ Ponderosa Homes to do any extensive studies. He indicated that he was not in favor of <br />going through the Selway property. <br />Ms. Decker summarized the discussion, indicating that Commissioners Fox and Olson <br />did not wish to have any further studies; Commissioners Peazce and Blank are in favor of <br />looking into designs that would put a pathway in front of houses, with Commissioner <br />Blank favoring an evaluation of Trenery Drive as an alternative; and Chairperson Arkin <br />also favored looking at Trenery Drive. <br />Commissioner Peazce pointed out that walkability and the perception of safety aze two <br />different matters. She noted that what is being addressed here is the perception of safety <br />rather than actual safety, and this would be alleviated if the path runs along the fronts of <br />houses. She reiterated that she did not think it was a possibility to have a path along the <br />house frontage, but if it is, she would like to see more information on it. <br />Commissioner Blank commented that the only place this would be possible is on Trenery <br />Drive. He added that he was willing to forego further studies on the Selway property. <br />Chairperson Arkin concurred with Commission Blank on both matters. <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that he did not think it was possible to have a <br />pathway that faces the fronts of houses, even on Trenery Drive. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 10, 2006 Page 17 of 19 <br />