My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041906
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 041906
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:23:54 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 9:25:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 041906
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ moving forwazd with the Cheesecake Factory and P.F. Chang Restaurant. She noted that <br />Mills has submitted the necessary lot line adjustment application facilitating the release <br />of building permits for those buildings. Mills is also concentrating on the two <br />restaurants. The building plans for the Cheesecake Factory have been in the Planning <br />Department, and she believed they were in the second round of comments. Mills has not <br />indicated to staff that it is not moving forwazd; it is not proceeding with the Nordstrom's <br />expansion at this time. <br />Residential Sprinklers <br />Commissioner Blank wished to follow up on the memo on sprinklers and expressed <br />concern about the conclusion of the memo on sprinklers. He believed the item should be <br />agendized in order to take public comment on whether it would be a good idea or not. He <br />believed the need for approval by the City Council was at odds with the basic charter of <br />the Planning Commission. <br />Ms. Decker noted that this was staff s belated effort to respond to eazlier questions from <br />the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission requested that staff determine <br />what the differences were between the City of Pleasanton and the City of Livermore <br />regazding requirements for the installation of fire sprinkler systems in new residential <br />construction. Staff also wanted to receive further questions from the Planning <br />Commission€rs regazding sprinklers in new residential construction so that they could be <br />addressed by the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department. She added that staff has also <br />~ ~ requested the Livermore Pleasanton Fire Department for either of two dates, May 24~h or <br />June 28~', to agendize this item for discussion. She invited the Commissioners to email <br />their questions to her or Maria Hoey in order to forwazd them to the Fire Department or <br />directly to the Fire Department if desired. <br />Hilltou and Ridgeton Development <br />Commissioner Fox noted that she had attended a session at the Planner's Institute <br />addressing ridgetop and hilltop development. One presenter stated that San Juan <br />Capistrano described its ordinance where no grading or any type of development was <br />allowed within 200 feet of a ridgetop in all directions. She inquired whether there was <br />interest in looking at the wording of this ordinance for Pleasanton, especially from a <br />landslide and safety perspective. <br />Commissioner Blank did not mind agendizing that discussion. <br />Chairperson Arkin supported agendizing the discussion as well and suggested discussing <br />it with several Councilmembers to gauge support before staff invests significant time in <br />it. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 19, 2006 Page 9 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.