PC 032906 - Laserfiche WebLink

A discussion ensued regarding the details of adult supervision. Commission Pearce believed that "guardian" or any other legal definition of adult supervision would be too restrictive in the framework of dropoffs for children's parties. Commissioner Blank suggested that there be no unsupervised dropoffs and no unsupervised children on-site. The Commission generally agreed that "no unsupervised children" would be dropped off at the site. Commission Peazce expressed concern about the pazking and inquired whether the 4:1 ratio was developed by staff. Ms. Decker replied that staff believed this to be a reasonable ratio based on the information provided by the applicant. Staff believed that would be a reasonable ratio in terms of the facility's use. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Frank Tate, applicant, described the concept for his project and believed it filled a need for pazents who wished to have a compatible family entertainment experience that both children and parents could enjoy. He also wanted to offer a wider variety of menu items that were healthful. The mothers who participated in the focus groups were concerned i"" about safety and the ability for the children to get exercise during the rainy season. The fathers wanted to have ESPN available in the facility as well as quality food and Wi-Fi access. The parents also wanted to be able to hold a conversation within the facility. He noted that this intention was to create the "second happiest place on earth," with a welcoming, family atmosphere. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regazding whether they would have a staff member trained in CPR, Mr. Tate confirmed that he would. He added that they would also have defibrillators, closed-circuit TV cameras at each exit, and a closely monitored check-in process. He added that they would target the age group of 2 to 12, and that high school kids were not part of their plan. He noted that they would not have any violent video games. There would also be a toddler azea for children under 5 years of age, where a parent would be required to stay. Sherman Balch, applicant, noted that they spent a considerable amount of time changing the original parking model. He noted that Condition No. 4 was subject to a misunderstanding regarding the number of children and allotted pazking spaces. He suggested replacing "guests" with "patrons" to accommodate pazents bringing children to a party. For private party patrons, he would like to see one pazking space for every two patrons. For walk-ins, sports team usage, and off-peak activities, he would like to use the 4:1 pazking ratio. He agreed with the Commission's assessment regazding unsupervised dropoffs. He would like to plant large specimen trees or palm trees in the front. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Mazch 29, 2006 Page 14 of 25