PC 032906 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regazding whether he objected to Condition No. 6 containing the wording "the pazent/guazdian is remaining on-site" in the letter from the Department of Social Services, Mr. Balch replied that "guazdian" had a legal connotation that they could not enforce and suggested the phrase "parent or chaperone." He noted that their staff would not be directly supervising the children. Ms. Decker noted that the first sentence of Condition No. 6 would be removed, leaving the condition: "The applicant is required to obtain written approval from State Department of Social Service Community Caze licensing prior to implementing any activities that may allow children being dropped off at the facility." Conditions would be added that would address the concerns: "Children shall be checked into the facility, and unsupervised dropoffs would not be permitted" Also, "Unsupervised children shall not be permitted within the facility. A designated adult, not including staff or members affiliated to SuperFranks, shall be with the child or group of children engaged in the activities of the facility." Also, "Changes in operations will need to have a modification to the conditional use permit unless otherwise determined by the Planning Director." She noted the changes regazding Condition No. 4 related to "party patrons" rather than "party guests," and one pazking space for every two patrons is acceptable to staff. Language regazding "walk-ins, sports teams, and off-peak uses" would also be clarified for that condition. Vanessa Kawaihu, 871 Sycamore Road, was glad that the pazking conditions had been clazified. She encouraged the Commission to approve this project and believed it would ~^ be an enhancement to the City's indoor recreation options. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Roberts moved to make the required conditional use findings as listed in the staff report and to approve Case PCUP-161, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B of the staff repots, as recommended by staff, with the following modifications: 1. Condition No. 4 is amended as follows: "The operator of the facility shall use the following parking ratio in determining the maximum occupancy capacity within the facility so that the demand for parking would not exceed the 128 parking space available on site: Private 6aest Party Patron: One parking space for every guest two patrons Walk-ins, snorts teams. and off-weak uses: One parking space for every four patrons "If parking from operation of the facility becomes an issue, the applicants shall be required to mitigate seise arkin impacts as determined by the Planning Director. Such mitigations may include scaling down grouped activities." PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Mazch 29, 2006 Page 15 of 25