PC 032906 - Laserfiche WebLink

ROLL CA] AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: RECUSED ABSENT: LL VOTE: Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, Peazce, and Roberts None. None. None. Commissioner Maas. Resolution No. PC-2006-12 was entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioner Fox inquired about the status of permitting these types of uses as previously discussed under Matters Initiated by Commission Members. Ms. Decker replied that staff has been working on a Code amendment to remove the requirement for a conditional use permit for these uses as well as others. A workshop to review those changes would take place, as would outreach to the Chamber of Commerce and other business organizations. d. PUD-80-08-1M/PCUP-161, Sherman Balch/SuperFranks Applications for a minor modification to an existing Planned Unit Development (PUD-80-06, Schoebers Racquetball) and for a conditional use permit to operate an indoor recreational facility in an existing building located at 5341 Owens Court. Zoning for the property is PUD-C (Planned Unit Development - Commercial) District. t~ Ms. Decker summarized the staff report and detailed the background and layout of this project. She noted that the applicant would perform alot-line adjustment, and the parking areas would be opened up to provide better circulation. Traffic circulation and parking between the site would also be enhanced. She noted that the applicant provided staff with an overall business operations plan that would mitigate the pazking concerns. The conditions placed on the project mitigate pazking and site circulation concerns. There was concern that childcaze licensing may need to be provided. The applicant provided a letter from the State indicating that the current proposal would not require any State licensing. Staff included a condition that was intended to allay concerns that if there were any changes to the existing operations and if children were dropped off unsupervised, the appropriate State licensing must be obtained. Staff supported this application and recommended that the required findings be made and the proposed family entertainment center be permitted at the subject location. In response to an inquiry by Commission Peazce regazding whether the language requiring that applicant's requirement to "mitigate noise impacts if pazking became an issue," refers instead to "pazkine impacts," Ms. Decker said yes. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding whether the language "no dropoff of children shall be allowed at any time" should be reworded to include "without parents or adult supervisors remaining on-site," Ms. Decker confirmed that was the ~ intent. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Mazch 29, 2006 Page 13 of 25