PC 011106 - Laserfiche WebLink

with this particulaz property owner. He added that the Specific Plan allowed for r^ development agreements if it was in the best interest of the City and the property owner. Chairperson Arkin addressed the discussion points included in the staff report: L Is the Planning Commission satisfied that the standazds of the Vineyazd Avenue Conidor Specific Plan for the location of use areas, property lines, etc., aze being followed by the overall development? Commissioner Fox would like staff to determine whether the EVA could be removed if the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan is not located there. She would support its removal and would like to heaz more about the traffic concerns on the EVA. Commissioner Maas believed that overall, this development was proceeding according to the Vineyazd Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. Chairperson Arkin agreed with both comments. 2. Is the Planning Commission comfortable with the overall site plan? Chairperson Arkin believed there was agreement that the Commission was comfortable with this proposed plan. 3. Is the Planning Commission satisfied with the overall grading plan? Chairperson Arkin noted that he did not see a grading plan. Commissioner Roberts noted that she did not understand the grading plan. The Commission agreed that a site visit would be necessary to address this issue. Commissioner Roberts believed that a view from farther away, such as Shadow Cliffs, would be important to see. There was consensus among the Commissioners requesting a cleazer, more legible grading plan when the project returns to the Commission 4. Instead of the slope banks, should the applicants address the differences in grade elevations between lots with a combination of split-pad lots, contour graded lots, etc.? The Commission agreed that a site visit would be necessary in order to address this question. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 2006 Page 8 of 19