PC 011106 - Laserfiche WebLink

noted that Mr. Alexander indicated that he had a concern about traffic but that he did not ~` want an EVA; he believed that both of those points were inconsistent. He preferred to have Claza Lane opened up so the EVA could accommodate construction vehicles with less impact on the other residences. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin regazding whether the homes would be sold, Mr. Hughes replied that Mr. Hatsushi wished to give those four lots to his children. The nine lots to the north would be sold. Chairperson Arkin preferred that the four homes be built at the same time to minimize inconvenience to the residents. Mr. Hughes stated that it would be unlikely that all of the houses would be constructed at the same time. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas regarding whether the staff report normally included information about the trees, Ms. Decker replied that it would depend on the impacts of the number of trees that may or may not be removed. A report for the Commission's review was included, and a more detailed analysis would be brought back as part of the staff report for the next workshop or public hearing. Commissioner Maas noted that page 5 of the tree report stated that "the value of 19 heritage trees recommended for removal is $73,700." In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas regazding whether the discussion with Mr. Lloyd with respect to moving the EVA away from his home was ongoing, Ms. Decker confirmed that it was. She added that the proximity of the EVA to his home was not intended. Discussions were taking place to determine the feasibility of moving the EVA farther from his home. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regarding whether the Commission could walk the property to clarify the grading situation, Ms. Decker confirmed that would be possible. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas regazding whether any visuals from Mr. Lloyd's house would be available, Ms. Decker replied that would be brought back to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Fox noted that when the Vineyard Avenue Specific Plan was done, it was assumed that the Neal School would be built. She inquired whether the EVA had been installed because of the possibility of the school being built. Mr. Roush did not believe the EVA was put into because of the presence of the school and added that staff would look into it. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin regazding any time limit of the development agreement, Mr. Roush replied that there was no development agreement PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 2006 Page 7 of 19